Brison defense recast prosecution’s bribery case as a chain of assumptions, weak inferences, and flawed crypto evidence

Rolando Brison's defense has broadly challenged the prosecution's bribery case in the Court of First Instance. They argue the case relies heavily on inference, interpretation, and flawed crypto evidence rather than direct proof of a corrupt agreement. The defense characterizes the prosecution's arguments as a chain of assumptions and weak inferences, lacking concrete evidence.